GORDON, OFFICER IN CHARGE, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,
v.
HEIKKINEN

U.S. | 1952-11-10
No. 7
344 U.S. 870 Supreme Court of the United States (1952) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the petition for writ of habeas corpus upon the ground that the cause is moot.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Knut Einar Heikkinen, 240 F.2d 94 (7th Cir. 1957)
    …out bail caused him to petition for a writ of habeas corpus — the disposition of which is reported in United States ex rel. Heikkinen v. Gordon, 8 Cir., 190 F. 2d 16, certiorari granted 343 U.S. 903, 72 S.Ct. 632, 96 L.Ed. 1322, vacated and remanded 344 U.S. 870, 73 S.Ct. 163, 97 L.Ed. 674. A hearing de novo of the deportation proceedings was scheduled for January 30, 1951, at Duluth, Minnesota. Defendant was again charged with violations of the Immigration Act of 1924 and the Immigration Act of 1918, as a…
  • United States ex rel. Daniman v. Shaughnessy, 210 F.2d 564 (2d Cir. 1954)
    …8 U.S.C.A. The period of six months after the order became administratively final expired on January 14, 1954 and unless that period has been extended by the habeas corpus proceedings before Judge Conger this cause is now moot. Gordon v. Heikkinen, 344 U.S. 870, 73 S.Ct. 163, 97 L. Ed. 674. While the return to the writ and the traverse filed to that might possibly be read as being broad enough in language to raise an issue as to the validity of the order of deportation, none was in fact raised and any i…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw