RUTLEDGE
v.
HUDSPETH
RUTLEDGE
HUDSPETH
343 U.S. 954
Supreme Court of the United States (1952)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States ex rel. Collins v. Claudy, 204 F.2d 624 (3d Cir. 1953)…ything possible proeedurally, including an unavailing petition to the Supreme Court for writ of certiorari. Com. ex rel. Collins v. Claudy, 170 Pa.Super. 199, 85 A. 2d 663; allocatur refused April 1, 1952, at No, 1827A Misc.Docket; certiorari denied 343 U.S. 954, 72 S.Ct. 1048. On the merits, the grounds of relief now urged in the Federal proceeding were urged unsuccessfully in the state proceedings. . The Act of April 29, 1929, P.L. 854 provides in relevant part as follows: [*626] “Any person who, after…
-
Kelsey D. Bartlett v. Duty, 271 F.2d 264 (6th Cir. 1959)…s on the part of the District Judge, about which he complains. The affidavit fails to show what merit, if any, there is in his appeal. Morris v. Igoe, 7 Cir., 209 F. 2d 108; Beecher v. Leavenworth State Bank, 9 Cir., 191 F. 2d 812, certiorari denied 343 U.S. 954, 72 S.Ct. 1048, 96 L.Ed. 1354. The affidavit is insufficient to support the application to proceed in forma pauperis, Kenney v. Fox, 6 Cir., 232 F. 2d 288, certiorari denied Kenney v. Killian, 352 U.S. 855, 77 S.Ct. 84, 1 L.Ed.2d 66; Cuiksa v. Cit…