UNITED STATES
v.
GREAT LAKES DREDGE & DOCK CO.

U.S. | 1952-03-10
No. 466
342 U.S. 953 Supreme Court of the United States (1952) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • In re Gustafson, 650 F.2d 1017 (9th Cir. 1981)
    …emnor was given an adequate opportunity to explain his conduct as each summary contempt citation was issued, therefore no further process was due at the conclusion of trial. In MacInnis v. United States, 191 F. 2d 157 (9th Cir. 1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 953, 72 S.Ct. 628, 96 L.Ed. 708 (1952), this court affirmed a summary contempt citation under Rule 42(a) where counsel accused the judge of misconduct. This court found that the contemnor’s conduct was “a willful obstruction and disruption of the orderl…
    1 / 2

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw