MARINGER

v.

SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA; AND ROBERTS V. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By

• Johansen v. United States, 343 U.S. 427 (U.S. 1952)
  …a, that court nevertheless agreed with the Second Circuit, and held that the Federal Employees Compensation Act precluded recovery under the Public Vessels Act. To resolve the apparent conflict between these decisions, this Court granted certiorari. 342 U. S. 901. [*431] Section 1 of the Public Vessels Act of 1925 provides “That a libel in personam in admiralty may be brought against the United States ... for damages caused by a public vessel of the United States . . . .” We have already held that this Act g…
• United States v. Gaidys et Ux., 194 F.2d 762 (10th Cir. 1952)
  …jury suffered by a member of the force as the result of negligence on the part of another member is benefits under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act. And in two recent cases, Johansen v. United States, 2 Cir., 191 F. 2d 162, certiorari granted 342 U.S. 901, 72 S.Ct. 292, and Mandel v. United States, 3 Cir., 191 F. 2d 164, certiorari granted 342 U.S. 901, 72 S.Ct. 293, it was held that a civilian member of the crew of a ship owned and operated by the United States cannot maintain a suit against the Gov…

  ← 1 / 2 →