TATE
v.
CALIFORNIA ET AL.

U.S. | 1951-11-13
No. 409
342 U.S. 880 Supreme Court of the United States (1951) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Zwickler v. Koota, 389 U.S. 241 (U.S. 1967)
    …e, CIO v. Windsor, 353 U. S. 364; Shipman v. DuPre, 339 U. S. 321, with Stainback v. Mo Hock Ke Lok Po, 336 U. S. 368; Local SSSB, United Marine Div., Int'l Longshoremen [*245]’s Assn. v. Battle, 101 F. Supp. 650 (D. C. E. D. Va.), aff’d per curiam, 342 U. S. 880. See generally Note, Judicial Abstention From the Exercise of Federal Jurisdiction, 59 Col. L. Rev. 749, 772-774 (1959). New York provides a Declaratory Judgment remedy, N. Y. Civ. Prac. § 3001. See De Veau v. Braisted, 5 App. Div. 2d 603, 174 N. Y…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw