NORTH SIDE LAUNDRY CO.
v.
BOARD OF PROPERTY ASSESSMENT, APPEALS AND REVIEW, ALLEGHENY COUNTY
NORTH SIDE LAUNDRY CO.
BOARD OF PROPERTY ASSESSMENT, APPEALS AND REVIEW, ALLEGHENY COUNTY
342 U.S. 803
Supreme Court of the United States (1951)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question.
Mahlon E. Lewis for appellant.
Nathaniel K. Beck and Leonard Boreman for appellee.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Graves v. Associated Transp., Inc., 344 F.2d 894 (4th Cir. 1965)…e of it. The Virginia courts, like many others, subscribed to this view. See, e. g., Fere-bee v. Hungate, 192 Va. 32, 63 S.E. 2d 761, 764 (1951); Pittston Co. v. O’Hara, 191 Va. 886, 63 S.E. 2d 34, 42, appeal dismissed sub nom. Winn v. Pittston Co., 342 U.S. 803, 72 S.Ct. 38, 96 L.Ed. 608 (1951).3 The mutuality rule was probably never a solid wall; exceptions were created under the pressure of the public interest in an end to litigation. The thought was that under certain circumstances once the party again…
-
Blanche H. Lober v. Moore, 417 F.2d 714 (D.C. Cir. 1969)…isors, 207 Va. 827, 153 S.E. 2d 270, 274 (1967); Storm v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 199 Va. 130, 97 S.E. 2d 759, 761-762, 69 A.L.R.2d 849 (1957); Pittston Co. v. O’Hara, 191 Va. 886, 63 S.E. 2d 34, 42, appeal dismissed sub nom. Winn v. Pittston Co., 342 U.S. 803, 72 S.Ct. 38, 96 L.Ed. 608 (1951); Unemployment Compensation Comm. v. Harvey, 179 Va. 202, 18 S.E. 2d 390, 393 (1942). . E.g., Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Anderson, 200 Va. 385, 105 S.E. 2d 869, 872-873 (1958); Ferebee v. Hungate, 192 Va. 32, 63 S.E.…