WYBACK

v.

CRANOR, SUPERINTENDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Copeland Motor Co. v. Gen. Motors Corp., 199 F.2d 566 (5th Cir. 1952)
  …nts, count one, alleging a violation of the anti-trust laws, was the primary count in the suit, and, because it set up matters which were involved in a suit on appeal to the United States Supreme Court, in Emich Motors Corp. v. General Motors Corp., 341 U.S. 906, 71 S.Ct. 610, 95 L.Ed. 1345, finally decided in April of 1951, both parties permitted the suit to pend without action in it until that case was decided. (2) When the case was decided, count one had to be abandoned, and it was dismissed on Oct. 29,…
• DELTA AIR Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Bd., 280 F.2d 43 (2d Cir. 1960)
  …change was beyond the Interstate Commerce Commission’s power. In any event, the present case is clearly distinguishable from the case of United States v. Rock Island Motor Transit Co., 1951, 340 U.S. 419, 71 S.Ct. 382, 95 L.Ed. 391, rehearing denied 341 U.S. 906, 71 S.Ct. 609, 95 L.Ed. 1344, where the Supreme Court held that the Commission had power, apart from a proceeding under Section 212(a), to impose specific restrictions to implement an already existing but somewhat generally-phrased restriction on th…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Morris, 516 F.2d 959 (4th Cir. 1975)
  …tion. A similar question was considered by a three-judge district court in Consumer Mail Order Association of America v. McGrath, 94 F.Supp. 705 (D.C.D.C.), aff’d. per curiam without opinion 340 U.S. 925, 71 S.Ct. 500, 95 L.Ed. 668 (1950), reh. den. 341 U.S. 906, 71 S.Ct. 611, 95 L.Ed. 1344. In that case the court upheld the constitutionality of the Jenkins Act; and while Morris claims that the decision of the Supreme Court there is not binding on this court, we are of the opinion that the Act is not inval…