PRUNK ET AL.
v.
INDIANAPOLIS REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION ET AL.
PRUNK ET AL.
INDIANAPOLIS REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION ET AL.
340 U.S. 950
Supreme Court of the United States (1951)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Communist Party of the United States v. Subversive Activities Control Bd., 367 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1961)…. A statutory three-judge court denied preliminary relief, Communist Party of the United States v. McGrath, 96 F. Supp. 47, but stayed answer and hearings before the Board pending appeal. After this Court denied a petition for extension of the stay, 340 U. S. 950, the Party abandoned the suit. Hearings began on April 23, 1951, and ended on July 1, 1952.5 Twenty-two witnesses for the Attorney General and three for the Party presented oral testimony; 507 exhibits, many of book length, were received; the stenog…
-
Sauber v. Whetstone, 199 F.2d 520 (7th Cir. 1952)…irmed by this court, No. 9779 without opinion, certiorari denied 337 U.S. 941, 69 S.Ct. 1519, 93 L.Ed. 1746, rehearing denied 338 U.S. 840, 70 S.Ct. 36, 94 L.Ed. 514; Whetstone v. United States, 115 Ct.Cl. 816; Whetstone v. O’Donovan, U. S. Marshal, 340 U.S. 950, 71 S.Ct. 569, 95 L.Ed. 685, denying appellant’s motion for leave to file a petition for a writ of mandamus; Whetstone v. Jarecki, D.C.N.D.Ill., No. 51 C 269,* a suit in equity asking for the convening of a three-judge court; as well as several othe…