SCHWEGMANN BROTHERS ET AL.
v.
CALVERT DISTILLERS CORP.; AND SCHWEGMANN BROTHERS ET AL. V. SEAGRAM-DISTILLERS CORP.
SCHWEGMANN BROTHERS ET AL.
CALVERT DISTILLERS CORP.; AND SCHWEGMANN BROTHERS ET AL. V. SEAGRAM-DISTILLERS CORP.
340 U.S. 928
Supreme Court of the United States (1951)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Elder v. Brannan, 341 U.S. 277 (U.S. 1951)…w of the judgment that petitioners’ allegations as to deprivation of reemployment or reinstatement rights stated a cause of action under the statute. We granted certiorari because of the obvious impact of these issues on federal employment policies. 340 U. S. 928 (1951). For reasons outlined below, we agree that petitioners’ separation from service was in full accord with the statute. We disagree with the holding that the allegations of the complaint are sufficient to state an unlawful deprivation of a pref…
-
Crest Specialty v. Trager, 341 U.S. 912 (U.S. 1951)…Certi-orari, 340 U. S. 928, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. [*913] Per Curiam: The judgment is reversed. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp., 340 U. S. 147. April 23, 1951. Clarence E. Threedy argued the cause and…