HAMMERSTEIN

v.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Bowman Dairy Co. v. United States, 341 U.S. 214 (U.S. 1951)
  …for, but refused to produce any of them. After a hearing, the District Court held him in contempt. The Court of Appeals reversed, 185 F. 2d 159. We granted certiorari [*218] because of the importance of the scope of Rule 17 (c) in federal practice. 340 U. S. 919. During the hearing on petitioners’ motions for an order under Rule 17 (c), respondent Hotchkiss, acting for the Government, had offered to produce, and to enter into a stipulation therefor, all documents of evidentiary character, in the custody of…
• Hammerstein v. Superior Court of Cal., 340 U.S. 622 (U.S. 1951)
  …*623] a hearing. After judgment, petitioner filed in the California Supreme Court a petition for a writ of certiorari to review the superior court proceedings. The California Supreme Court denied this petition without opinion. We granted certiorari, 340 U. S. 919 (1951). Throughout these proceedings, petitioner preserved his federal questions, but since neither of the decisions below was accompanied by an opinion, it is not clear whether the California courts found it necessary to decide any federal questio…