SHUB

v.

SIMPSON, SECRETARY OF STATE OF MARYLAND

Citator

Cited By

• Spano v. New York, 360 U.S. 315 (U.S. 1959)
  …izona, 356 U. S. 390; Fikes v. Alabama, 352 U. S. 191; Leyra v. Denno, 347 U. S. 556; Stein v. New York, 346 U. S. 156; Brown v. Allen, 344 U. S. 443; Stroble v. California, 343 U. S. 181; Gallegos v. Nebraska, 342 U. S. 55; Johnson v. Pennsylvania, 340 U. S. 881; Harris v. South Carolina, 338 U. S. 68; Turner v. Pennsylvania, 338 U. S. 62; Watts v. Indiana, 338 U. S. 49; Lee v. Mississippi, 332 U. S. 742; Haley v. Ohio, 332 U. S. 596; Malinski v. New York, 324 U. S. 401; Lyons v. Oklahoma, 322 U. S. 596; As…
• Culombe v. Connecticut, 367 U.S. 568 (U.S. 1961)
  …that we did not find, in the circumstances there presented, that police interrogators had overborne the accused. The cases most closely comparable to the present one on their facts are Turner v. Pennsylvania, 338 U. S. 62, Johnson v. Pennsylvania, 340 U. S. 881, and Fikes v. Alabama, 352 U. S. 191. Turner, like Culombe, was arrested without a warrant and, without having been brought before a magistrate,90 was detained during four nights and about five days before he confessed. Like Culombe, also, he was q…
• Fikes v. Alabama, 352 U.S. 191 (U.S. 1957)
  …ery much like those that were before the Court in Turner v. Pennsylvania, 338 U. S. 62, while the present petitioner was a weaker and more susceptible subject than the record in that case reveals Turner to have been. And cf. Johnson v. Pennsylvania, 340 U. S. 881. The totality of the circumstances that preceded the confessions in this case goes beyond the allowable limits. The use of the confessions secured in this setting was a denial of due process. Neither Stein v. New York, 346 U. S. 156, nor any of the…