ARRINGTON

v.

ALABAMA

Citator

Cited By

• United States ex rel. Almeida v. Baldi, 195 F.2d 815 (3d Cir. 1952)
  …obliquely dispose of the issue of deliberately suppressed evidence vital to the defense. Application for cer-tiorari was made to the Supreme Court of the United States and was denied, 339 U.S. 924, 70 S.Ct. 614, 94 L.Ed. 1346. Rehearing was denied, 339 U.S. 950, 70 S.Ct. 798, 94 L.Ed. 1364. Almeida then filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania which set up in detail the evidence secured at Smith’s trial and to which we have referred in the second preceding paragrap…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Carabbia, 381 F.2d 133 (6th Cir. 1967)
  …sked. The exercise of this discretion, and the restriction upon inquiries at the request of counsel, were subject to the essential demands of fairness.” See also United States v. Dennis, 339 U.S. 162, 168, 70 S.Ct. 519, 94 L.Ed. 734, rehearing den. 339 U.S. 950, 70 S.Ct. 799, 94 L.Ed. 1364; Johnson v. United States, 270 F. 2d 721 (C.A. 9), cert. den. 362 U.S. 937, 80 S.Ct. 759, 4 L.Ed.2d 751; Stone [*137] v. United States, 324 F. 2d 804 (C.A. 5), cert. den. 376 U.S. 938, 84 S.Ct. 793, 11 L.Ed.2d 659; Unite…
• Tate v. People of the State of Cal., 187 F.2d 98 (9th Cir. 1951)
  …ates Supreme Court, Tate v. Heinze, 338 U.S. 956, 70 S.Ct. 491; 3-27-50, Rehearing denied by the United States Supreme Court, Tate v. Heinze, 339 U.S. 926, 70 S.Ct. 610, 94 L.Ed. -; 5-1-50, Second Rehearing denied by the United States Supreme Court, 339 U.S. 950, 70 S.Ct. 798, 94 L.Ed.-. Unquestionably, petitioner was justly convicted, and the sentence under the state Habitual Criminal Act, Pen. Code, § 644, was justified. In view of the fact that there is no merit in the present petition, the petition to…