MCCANN

v.

NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF PAROLE

Citator

Cited By

• Blumcraft OF Pittsburgh v. The United States, 372 F.2d 1014 (Ct. Cl. 1967)
  …tment of the Navy did not have sufficient identity of appearance with a design patent for a combination bookcase and desk-cabinet to constitute infringement thereof. Dickey v. United States, 114 Ct.Cl. 439, 455, 84 F.Supp. 741, (1949), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 938, 70 S.Ct. 339, 94 L.Ed. 578 (1950). In 1955 this court considered a design patent on a plastic-covered wire staple removing device. The court found that patent invalid and stated that the only substantial difference between the prior art staple remo…
• O'Connor v. United States, 415 F.2d 1110 (9th Cir. 1969)
  …2 L.Ed. 349; Jones v. Perkins, (1918) 245 U.S. 390, 38 S.Ct. 166, 62 L.Ed. 358; Heflin v. Sanford, (5 Cir. 1944) 142 F. 2d 798; Wolfe v. United States, (6 Cir. 1945) 149 F. 2d 391; Atherton v. United States, (9 Cir. 1949) 176 F. 2d 835, cert. denied 338 U.S. 938, 70 S.Ct. 338, 94 L.Ed. 578 (1950). It does not provide for an invalid delegation of powers with respect to conscientious objectors. Wolfe v. United States, supra; Dingman v. United States, (9 Cir. 1946) 156 F. 2d 148, cert. denied 329 U.S. 730, 67…
• United States v. Chandler, 403 F.2d 531 (4th Cir. 1968)
  …axation and not confiscation of property. See also United States v. Hoepker, 223 F. 2d 921, 923 (7 Cir. 1955), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 841, 76 S.Ct. 81, 100 L.Ed. 750 (1955); Atherton v. United States, 176 F. 2d 835, 840 (9 Cir. 1949), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 938, 70 S.Ct. 338, 94 L.Ed. 578 (1950); Wolfe v. United States, 149 F. 2d 391, 393 (6 Cir. 1945); Kramer v. United States, 147 F. 2d 756, 759 (6 Cir. 1945), cert. denied, 324 U.S. 878, 65 S.Ct. 1026, 89 L.Ed. 1429 (1945); Roodenko v. United States, 147…