SINCLAIR
v.
UNITED STATES
SINCLAIR
UNITED STATES
338 U.S. 908
Supreme Court of the United States (1950)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The judgment is reversed. United States v. Limehouse, 285 U. S. 424; Swearingen v. United States, 161 U. S. 446.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Eastern Greyhound Lines v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 337 F.2d 84 (6th Cir. 1964)…is a supervisor if he possesses any one of the powers there described to be exercised in his independent judgment. N. L. R. B. v. Edward G. Budd Mfg. Co., 169 F. 2d 571 (CA 6, 1948) , cert. denied sub nom. Foreman’s Ass’n v. Edward G. Budd Mfg. Co., 338 U.S. 908, 69 S.Ct. 411, 93 L.Ed. 441 (1949); Ohio Power Co. v. N. L. R. B., 176 F. 2d 385, 11 A.L.R.2d 243 (CA 6, 1949) , cert. denied, 338 U.S. 899, 70 S.Ct. [*88] 249, 94 L.Ed. 553 (1949). We are compelled to conclude that Eastern’s dispatchers are made su…
-
United States v. Keller, 259 F.2d 54 (3d Cir. 1958)…cient to sustain the indictment. The language complained of in count 14 refers to memories of sharing a bedroom. But is does not appear from this postal card that this was a reference to an illicit relationship. Cf. Sinclair v. United States, 1950, 338 U.S. 908, 70 S.Ct. 342, 94 L.Ed. 559, reversing per curiam, 3 Cir., 1949, 174 F. 2d 933. Certainly if the reference is to sexual intercourse it is cloaked. Furthermore, the words used possess a negligible appeal to pruriency. We think they do not meet the te…
Authorities Cited
- Swearingen v. United States, 161 U.S. 446 (U.S. 1896)
- United States v. Limehouse, 285 U.S. 424 (U.S. 1932)