WALSH, SHERIFF,
v.
UNITED STATES EX REL. WHITE

U.S. | 1949-10-10
No. 199
338 U.S. 804 Supreme Court of the United States (1949) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to the District Court with directions to discharge the writ of habeas corpus and remand the respondent to custody.

John S. Boyle for petitioner. Joseph I. Bulger and Ode L. Rankin for respondent.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Cascade Natural Gas Corp. v. EL Paso Natural GAS Co., 386 U.S. 129 (U.S. 1967)
    …brought by the Government. From that time since, we have consistently refused to recognize the right to intervene in government antitrust suits.16 Allen Calculators, Inc. v. National Cash Register Co., 322 U. S. 137; Partmar Corp. v. United States, 338 U. S. 804; Wometco Television & Theatre Co. v. United States, 355 U. S. 40; Westinghouse Broadcasting Co. v. United States, 364 U. S. 518, dismissing appeal from 186 F. Supp. 776; Sam Fox Publishing Co. v. United States, supra; Bardy v. United States, 371 U.…
  • Battle v. Liberty Nat'l Life Ins. Co., 493 F.2d 39 (5th Cir. 1974)
    …avoid amplifying the inherent complexity and confusion in anti-trust litigation, the courts have generally refused to allow a private plaintiff intervention to press his claim in a suit brought by the government. See Partmar Corp. v. United States, 338 U.S. 804, 70 S.Ct. 69, 94 L.Ed. 486 (1949); Allen Calculators Inc. v. National Cash Register Co., 322 U.S. 137, 64 S.Ct. 905, 88 L.Ed. 1188 (1944). Even though the allegations in the complaint in the case at hand may be similar to those in the 1954 case, th…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw