STANDARD OIL CO. OF INDIANA

v.

SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Sniadach v. Fam. Fin. Corp. of Bay View, 395 U.S. 337 (U.S. 1969)
  …of a Court opinion but affirmed it in a per curiam, opinion, 279 U. S. 820, on the authority of two prior decisions of this Court. See also Standard Oil Co. v. Superior Court of New Castle County, 44 Del. [*349] 538, 62 A. 2d 454, appeal dismissed, 336 U. S. 930; Harris v. Balk, 198 U. S. 215, 222, 227-228. The Supreme Court of Wisconsin, in upholding the constitutionality of its law also cited the following statement of our Court made in Rothschild v. Knight, 184 U. S. 334, 341: “To what actions the reme…
• Cal. Ass'n of Emp'rs v. Bldg. & Constr. Trades Council of Reno, 178 F.2d 175 (9th Cir. 1949)
  …alifornia v. Superior Court, 32 Cal.2d 119, 194 P. 2d 689, citing with approval the Amazon Cotton, Mill case, supra. Appellant also relies on Riley v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, etc., 95 N.H. 162, 59 A. 2d 476, judgment vacated as moot, 336 U.S. 930, 69 S.Ct. 737, wherein a declaratory judgment as to whether the State or the Federal Labor Laws applied was rendered. It [*179] need only be pointed out that the State court was one of general jurisdiction, whereas the district courts of the United…
• W. URN Mfg. Co. & Farmer Bros. Co. v. Am. Pipe & Steel Corp., 284 F.2d 279 (D.C. Cir. 1960)
  …118 A. 2d 515. . Applying New York law, see Heydemann v. Westinghouse Electric Mfg. Co., 2 Cir., 1936, 80 F. 2d 837, 840. And see Standard Oil Co. v. Superior Court, 1948, 5 Terry 538, 44 Del. 538, 62 A. 2d 454, 149 A.L.R.2d 405, appeal dismissed, 336 U.S. 930, 69 S.Ct. 738, 93 L.Ed. 1090 “for want of a substantial federal question”; rehearing denied, 1949, 336 U.S. 955, 69 S.Ct. 879, 93 L.Ed. 1109; 14 A.L.R.2d 420, note § 5, 430.…