TINGLE ET AL.

v.

ANDERSON-TULLY CO.

Citator

Cited By (36 total)

• Wilkerson v. McCARTHY, 336 U.S. 53 (U.S. 1949)
  …ckawanna & W. R. Co. v. Mostyn, 332 U. S. 770. Atlantic Coast Line v. Meeks, 333 U. S. 827. Wabash R. Co. v. Hampton, 333 U. S. 833. Fleming v. Husted, 333 U. S. 843. Unity R. Co. v. Kurimsky, 333 U. S. 855. Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. Skidmore, 335 U. S. 816. E. Where lower court set aside a jury verdict for the employer because of erroneous instructions and ordered a new trial: Pennsylvania R. Co. v. McCarthy, 329 U. S. 812. H. R. Rep. No. 1386, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. 2 (1908). Cases where petitions f…
• United States v. Hyde, 448 F.2d 815 (5th Cir. 1971)
  …questions were proper in substance this would be a desirable rather than an undesirable result. We agree, however, with the distinction made by L. Hand, J., concurring in Skidmore v. Baltimore & O. Ry., 2 Cir., 1948, 167 F. 2d 54, 70, cert. denied, 335 U.S. 816, 69 S.Ct. 34, 93 L.Ed. 371, when speaking in favor of special verdicts in civil cases. “ T should like to subject a verdict, as narrowly as was practical, to a review which should make it in fact, what we very elaborately pretend that it should be:…
• United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913 (2d Cir. 1984)
  …n invalid conviction by faulting the defendant for failing to request interrogatories. See Skidmore v. Baltimore & Ohio Ry., 167 F. 2d 54, 70 (2d Cir.) (L. Hand, J., concurring) (jury particularization “undesirable” in criminal cases), cert, denied, 335 U.S. 816, 69 S.Ct. 34, 93 L.Ed. 371 (1948). See also United States v. Gallishaw, 428 F. 2d 760, 765 (2d Cir.1970) (noting the issue, but not resolving it). In United States v. Margiotta, 646 F. 2d 729, 733-34 (2d Cir. 1981), cert, denied,-U.S.-, 103 S.Ct…