AMBROSIA CHOCOLATE CO.

v.

AMBROSIA CAKE BAKERY, INC.

Citator

Cited By

• Mead Johnson & Co. v. Baby's Formula Serv., Inc., 402 F.2d 19 (5th Cir. 1968)
  …amages nor attorneys’ fees,” citing McLean v. Fleming, 96 U.S. 245, 24 L.Ed. 828 (1877); Anheuser-Busch Inc. v. Du Bois Brewing Co. 175 F. 2d 370 (3 Cir., 1949); Ambrosia Chocolate Co. v. Ambrosia Cake Bakery, 165 F. 2d 693 (4 Cir., 1947), cert. den 333 U.S. 882, 68 S.Ct. 914 92 L.Ed. 1157; Oakland Co. v. Kroger Co., 116 U.S.P.Q 1957 (S.D.Ill. N D 1957) The trial court erred in considering the long years of non-infringing use by Baby’s Formula as relevant to the defense of laches or as indicating acquiesce…
• Sweetheart Plastics, Inc. v. Detroit Forming, Inc., 743 F.2d 1039 (4th Cir. 1984)
  …nded in part, 695 F. 2d 96 (5th Cir.1983). Acquiescence may be inferred from the trademark owner’s affirmative conduct toward the defendant. For example, in Ambrosia Chocolate Co. v. Ambrosia Cake Bakery, 165 F. 2d 693 (4th Cir.1947), cert. denied 333 U.S. 882, 68 S.Ct. 914, 92 L.Ed. 1157 (1948), not only was the plaintiff aware that the defendant was using the plaintiff’s registered trademark “Ambrosia” for eight years but also the plaintiff attempted to sell ingredients to the defendant to be used in ma…
• Drayton Heard and Elizabeth A. Heard v. Commissioner OF Internal Revenue, 269 F.2d 911 (3d Cir. 1959)
  …official designated to receive it. United States v. Lombardo, 1916, 241 U.S. 73, 76, 36 S.Ct. 508, 60 L.Ed. 897; Hilker & Bletsch Co. v. United States, 7 Cir., 1954, 210 F. 2d 847; McRae v. Woods, Em.App. 1948, 165 F. 2d 790, certiorari denied 1948, 333 U.S. 882, 68 S.Ct. 912, 92 L.Ed. 1157, rehearing denied 1948, 334 U.S. 830, 68 S.Ct. 1336, 92 L.Ed. 1758; Poy- [*914] nor v. Commissioner, 5 Cir., 1936, 81 F. 2d 521.1 Petitioners then protest the double penalty assessed for the untimely filing of their dec…