HUNTER
v.
TEXAS ELECTRIC RAILWAY CO.
HUNTER
TEXAS ELECTRIC RAILWAY CO.
332 U.S. 827
Supreme Court of the United States (1947)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The judgment is affirmed. Dissenting: Mr. .Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Murphy, and Mr. Justice Rutledge.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Acheson v. Droesse, 197 F.2d 574 (D.C. Cir. 1952)…motion to' direct that the judgment below be vacated, both motions should be granted. Counsel for Mrs. Droesse cites Schenley Distilling Corp. v. Anderson, 333 U.S. 878, 68 S.Ct. 914, 92 L.Ed. 1154 (1948), Pan American Airways Corp. v. Grace & Co., 332 U.S. 827, 68 S.Ct. 203, 92 L.Ed. 401 (1947), and Uyeki v. Styer, 329 U.S. 689, 67 S.Ct. 486, 91 L.Ed. 604 (1947), as moot cases in which, because there was no likelihood of further litigation between the parties on the same issues, the appellate tribunal mer…1 / 2
-
In re the United States-South Am. Route Case, 371 U.S. 314 (U.S. 1963)…d to proceed under § 411 to order Pan American to divest itself of its holdings in Panagra. See W. R. Grace & Co. v. CAB, 154 F. 2d 271, 274 (C. A. 2d Cir. 1946), cert, dismissed for mootness sub nom. Pan American Airways Corp. v. W. R. Grace & Co., 332 U. S. 827. See Panagra Terminal Investigation, 4 C. A. B. 670, 678 (1944) ; Additional Service to Latin America, 6 C. A. B. 857, 913-914 (1946) ; Pan American-Panagra Agreement, 8 C. A. B. 50, 61 (1947); New York-Balboa Through Service Proceeding, Reopened,…