NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. ET AL.
v.
NORTON, SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE; AND NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. ET AL. V. NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE CO. ET AL.
NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. ET AL.
NORTON, SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE; AND NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. ET AL. V. NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE CO. ET AL.
331 U.S. 844
Supreme Court of the United States (1947)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Vickery v. Fisher Governor Co., 417 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1969)…her the substantive law was correctly applied.” 6 Moore, Federal Practice ¶ 56.27 [1] at 2973 (footnote omitted). See Koepke v. Fontecchio, 177 F. 2d 125 (9th Cir. 1949); Keehn v. Brady Transfer & Storage Co., 159 F. 2d 383 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 331 U.S. 844, 67 S.Ct. 1535, 91 L.Ed. 1864 (1947). We note, as did the district court, that the contract’s provisions for termination are unambiguous (R.T. 483). Unless appellant can produce a persuasive legal theory which looks beyond this language, appellee’s…