CORN PRODUCTS REFINING CO.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.

U.S. | 1947-06-02
No. 1309
331 U.S. 790 Supreme Court of the United States (1947) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

[*790] Per Curiam:

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. United States v. American Sheet & Tin Plate Co., 301 U. S. 402; United States v. Wabash R. Co., 321 U. S. 403.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …ts, a preference necessarily resulting when a service is rendered “in excess [*195] of that which the carriers are obliged to perform by their tariffs.” United States v. Wabash R. Co., supra, 412, 413. In Corn Products Refining Co. v. United States, 331 U. S. 790, this Court affirmed per curiam a decision upholding the exclusion, on grounds of irrelevancy, of evidence pertaining to the custom and practice of carriers in making delivery to other shippers. If custom may not be used to interpret “line-haul” aft…
    1 / 2

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw