WILSON

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Stromberg, 268 F.2d 256 (2d Cir. 1959)
  …ith which a jury should approach accomplice testimony necessarily constitute reversible error, although it is the better practice to give it. Caminetti v. United States, supra; United States v. Wilson, 2 Cir., 154 F. 2d 802, vacated for resentencing 328 U.S. 823, 66 S.Ct. 1363, 90 L.Ed. 1603; Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United States, 4 Cir., 260 F. 2d 397, certiorari limited to another question 358 U.S. 917, 79 S.Ct. 289, 3 L.Ed.2d 237; United States v. Bucur, 7 Cir., 194 F. 2d 297. Here, it is true that…
• Nw. States Portland Cement Co. v. Minnesota, 358 U.S. 450 (U.S. 1959)
  …act being taxed was income from intrastate commerce there is no reason why gross receipts [*467] as well as net income could not have been reached by the State.1 Surely any possible doubt on this score is removed by West Publishing Co. v. McColgan, 328 U. S. 823, where this Court unanimously affirmed, without oral argument, a decision of the California Supreme Court upholding the validity of a statute taxing “income from any activities carried on in this State, regardless of whether carried on in intrastate…

  ← 1 / 4 →
• United States v. Masino, 275 F.2d 129 (2d Cir. 1960)
  …duly taken. We are of the opinion that a charge on this subject should have been given. Cratty v. United States, 1947, 82 U.S.App.D.C. 236, 163 F. 2d 844, 850; United States v. Wilson, 2 Cir., 154 F. 2d 802, 805, judgment vacated and remanded 1946, 328 U.S. 823, 66 S.Ct. 1363, 90 L.Ed. 1603; United States v. Becker, 2 Cir., 1933, 62 F. 2d 1007, 1009. Whether a failure so to charge is error or not depends on the other circumstances of the case. But here the government’s case depended on Brown and Beville al…