NORTH CAROLINA ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES ET AL.; AND DAVIS, ECONOMIC STABILIZATION DIRECTOR, V. UNITED STATES ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Union Leader Corp. v. Newspapers OF NEW England Inc., 284 F.2d 582 (1st Cir. 1960)
  …njustifiable to advertise in both. . We expressly disclaim any approval of the court’s citation of Allen Bradley Co. v. Local No. 3, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, 1945, 325 U.S. 797, 65 S.Ct. 1533, 89 L.Ed. 1939, rehearing denied 326 U.S. 803, 66 S.Ct. 11, 90 L.Ed. 489. We are not required to decide whether the union violated the antitrust law, and so need not consider the very difficult 'problem of where labor’s immunity to antitrust prosecution ceases. . The court expressly found that…
• Cal. Dump Truck Owners Ass'n, Inc. v. Associated Gen. Contractors OF Am., 562 F.2d 607 (9th Cir. 1977)
  …he purposes of collective bargaining or other mutual aid or protection This exemption is not absolute; it is subject to exceptions. In Allen Bradley Co. v. Local Union No. 3, IBEW, 325 U.S. 797, 809, 65 S.Ct. 1533, 1540, 89 L.Ed. 1939, reh. denied, 326 U.S. 803, 66 S.Ct. 11, 90 L.Ed. 489 (1945), the Supreme Court said: when [a union participates] with a combination of businessmen who had complete power to eliminate all competition from others, a situation [is] created not included within the exemptions of…
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Dixie Shirt Co., Inc., 176 F.2d 969 (4th Cir. 1949)
  …d Regulations, Series 4, Section 203.58, Subsection (c) (2), and Section 203.42(b). See, also, Inland Empire Dist. Council, Lumber & Sawmill Workers Union, Lewiston, Idaho, v. Millis, 325 U.S. 697, 700, 65 S.Ct. 1316, 89 L.Ed. 1877, rehearing denied 326 U.S. 803, 66 S.Ct. 11, 90 L.Ed. 489; [*971] National Labor Relations Board v. American Laundry Machinery Co., 2 Cir., 152 F. 2d 400, 401; National Labor Relations Board v. J. L. Brandeis & Sons, 8 Cir., 145 F. 2d 556, 558; National Labor Relations Board v. N…