SEVEN UP CO.

v.

CHEER UP SALES CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Goldsmith v. United States, 277 F.2d 335 (D.C. Cir. 1960)
  …otely resembling “grilling.” Since the hearsay evidence of Thorley Coley was undoubtedly sufficient probable cause for arrest, under the doctrine enunciated in United States v. Heitner, 2 Cir., 149 F. 2d 105, certiorari denied, Cryne v. U. S., 1945, 326 U.S. 727, 66 S.Ct. 33, 90 L.Ed. 432, the inquiry was not needed to bolster defendants’ arrest; but it could be conducted to determine whether the suspects should be arraigned or released. This was both reasonable and necessary unless courts are to command ar…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• David Sherman Corp. v. Heublein, Inc., 340 F.2d 377 (8th Cir. 1965)
  …, and giving [*380] such attention as such purchasers usually give in buying that class of goods”, Queen Mfg. Co. v. Isaac Ginsberg & Bros., supra, p. 287 of 25 F. 2d; Seven Up Co. v. Cheer Up Sales Co., 148 F. 2d 909, 911 (8 Cir.1945), cert. denied 326 U.S. 727, 66 S.Ct. 32, 90 L.Ed. 431, or, as has been said otherwise, “an ordinarily prudent purchaser”. United Drug Co. v. Obear-Nester Glass Co., supra, p. 999 of 111 F. 2d; S. S. Kresge Co., v. Winget Kickerniek Co., 96 F. 2d 978, 987 (8 Cir. 1938), cert.…