ST. LOUIS AMUSEMENT CO. ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.

U.S. | 1945-10-08
No. 144
326 U.S. 680 Supreme Court of the United States (1945) Caution
Cited by 2 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. United States v. California Canneries, 279 U. S. 553, 556, and cases cited; Allen Co. v. Cash Register Co., 322 U. S. 137, 142.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …(Consent decree entered in prior suit does not preclude present suit since the two suits are dissimilar, inter alia, in respect of parties defendant.). Compare St. Louis Amusement Co. v. Paramount Pictures, 61 F.Supp. 854 (E.D.Mo.), app. dismissed, 326 U.S. 680, 66 S.Ct. 31, 90 L.Ed. 397 (1945) (“* * * While the present plaintiff was not a party to the Delaware suit, complainant is suing as a stockholder on behalf of itself and other stockholders of the Radio Corporation. That company was a party to the de…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw