CALIFORNIA (IN THE MATTER OF ESTATE OF LINDQUIST)
v.
UNITED STATES; CALIFORNIA (IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF WALKER) V. UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES (IN THE MATTER OF ESTATE OF LINDQUIST) V. CALIFORNIA; AND UNITED STATES (IN THE MATTER OF ESTATE OF WALKER) V. CALIFORNIA
CALIFORNIA (IN THE MATTER OF ESTATE OF LINDQUIST)
UNITED STATES; CALIFORNIA (IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF WALKER) V. UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES (IN THE MATTER OF ESTATE OF LINDQUIST) V. CALIFORNIA; AND UNITED STATES (IN THE MATTER OF ESTATE OF WALKER) V. CALIFORNIA
325 U.S. 869
Supreme Court of the United States (1945)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Reginald LAW v. Va. Stage Lines, Inc., 444 F.2d 990 (D.C. Cir. 1971)…ged from behind oncoming traffic) ; Capital Transit Co. v. Gamble, 82 U.S.App.D.C. 57, 160 F. 2d 283 (1947) (child darted out from behind furniture on sidewalk) ; Mackall v. Washington Gas Light Co., 79 U.S.App.D.C. 308, 147 F. 2d 149, cert. denied, 325 U.S. 869, 65 S.Ct. 1404, 89 L.Ed. 1988 (1945) (pedestrian overtook truck from right rear, out of driver’s normal range of vision). . As the majority points out, there is evidence tending to show that appellant was intoxicated at the time of the accident. In…