MASSMAN CONSTRUCTION CO.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Chris Berg, Inc. v. The United States, 426 F.2d 314 (Ct. Cl. 1970)
  …the Trust Territory, where wide differences among the bids were predictable and actually occurred. We turn now to defendant’s principal argument, which builds on Massman Contraction Co. v. United States, 60 F.Supp. 635, 102 Ct.Cl. 699, cert. denied 325 U.S. 866, 65 S.Ct. 1403, 89 L.Ed. 1985 (1945). It is that there is no basis for reformation because plaintiff knew of the mistake and signed the contract anyway. In [*317] that case, as here, the plaintiff had contracted at the bid price after defendant had…
• Dale Ingram, Inc. v. The United States, 475 F.2d 1177 (Ct. Cl. 1973)
  …R 2.406-3 does not apply to this case. It appears that prior to the publication of ASPR 2.406-3, the rule governing the problem before us was set forth in Massman Constr. Co. v. United States, 60 F.Supp. 635, 643, 102 Ct.Cl. 699, 717, cert. denied, 325 U.S. 866, 65 S.Ct. 1403, 89 L.Ed. 1985 (1945) as follows: At the time the contract was awarded to the plaintiff, pursuant to its bid, and at the time it signed the contract, the plaintiff was not mistaken. It had become aware of the mistake in its bid, and…
• In re Darwin Charles Brown, 454 F.2d 999 (D.C. Cir. 1971)
  …80 U.S. App.D.C. 106, 151 F. 2d 286 (1945); Laughlin v. United States, 80 U.S.App. D.C. 101, 151 F. 2d 281, cert, denied, 326 U.S. 777, 66 S.Ct. 265, 90 L.Ed. 470, (1945); Laughlin v. Eicher, 79 U.S.App. D.C. 266, 145 F. 2d 700 (1944), cert. denied, 325 U.S. 866, 65 S.Ct. 1403, 89 L.Ed. 1985 (1945); In re Fletcher, 71 App.D.C. 108, 107 F. 2d 666 (1939), cert. denied, 309 U.S. 664, 60 S.Ct. 593, 84 L.Ed. 1011 (1940); Bowles v. Laws, 59 App.D.C. 399, 45 F. 2d 669 (1930), cert. denied, 283 U.S. 841, 51 S.Ct. 4…