CLEVELAND

v.

UNITED STATES; DARGER V. UNITED STATES; JESSOP V. UNITED STATES ; DOCKSTADER V. UNITED STATES ; STUBBS V. UNITED STATES ; PETTY V. UNITED STATES; CHATWIN V. UNITED STATES; ZITTING V. UNITED STATES; AND CHRISTENSEN V. UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Tr. Under the Will of Bingham v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 325 U.S. 365 (U.S. 1945)
  …therefore concluded that all were rightly deducted in calculating the taxable net income of the trust. 2 T. C. 853. On the Government’s petition for review, the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed. 146 F. 2d 568. We granted certiorari, 324 U. S. 835, on a petition which asserted as grounds for the writ that the decision of the [*369] Court of Appeals departed from the principles laid down in Dobson v. Commissioner, 320 U. S. 489, governing review of decisions of the Tax Court, and that the deci…
• Chatwin v. United States, 326 U.S. 455 (U.S. 1946)
  …hority from the juvenile court officials.3 Having waived jury trials, the three petitioners were found guilty as charged and were given jail sentences. 56 E. Supp. 890. The court below affirmed the convictions. 146 F. 2d 730. We granted certiorari, 324 U. S. 835, because of our doubts as to the correctness of the judgment that the petitioners were guilty under the Federal Kidnap-ing Act on the basis of the foregoing facts. The Act by its own terms contemplates that the kid-naped victim shall have been (1)…