ADIRONDACK TRANSIT LINES, INC.

v.

UNITED STATES ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Langford v. United States, 178 F.2d 48 (9th Cir. 1949)
  …Upon Petition for Rehearing PER CURIAM. Upon petition for rehearing it is urged that our decision runs counter to Oriolo v. United States, 324 U.S. 824, 65 S.Ct. 683, 89 L.Ed. 1393. There, by memorandum opinion, the Court reversed United States v. Oriolo, 3 Cir., 146 F. 2d 152, on the authority of Mortensen v. United States, 322 U.S. 369, 64 S.Ct. 1037, 88 L.Ed. 1331. As pointed out by Judge Bigg…
• United States v. Fleenor, 162 F.2d 935 (7th Cir. 1947)
  …nn Act. In my judgment this case was far stronger for the government than either the Mortensen or the instant case. Nevertheless, the Supreme Court allowed certiorari and reversed the judgment without opinion on the strength o Í the Mor-tensen case. 324 U.S. 824, 65 S.Ct. 683, 89 L.Ed. 1393. In my view, the proof is wholly insufficient to support the judgment as to either count. I would reverse it. Entertaining this view, I find it unnecessary to consider the numerous other errors assigned.…
• United States v. Ross, 257 F.2d 292 (2d Cir. 1958)
  …arts so as to permit an inference that the purpose of the drive to Salt Lake City was innocent while the purpose of the homeward journey to Grand Island was criminal” (322 U.S. at page 375, 64 S.Ct. at page 1041). See, also, Oriolo v. United States, 324 U.S. 824, 65 S.Ct. 683, 89 L.Ed. 1393, reversing the Third Circuit decision reported in 146 F. 2d 152. The judgment is reversed and the indictment dismissed.…