DENICKE ET AL.
v.
ANGLO CALIFORNIA NATIONAL BANK ET AL.; DENICKE V. BRIGHAM ET AL.; AND DOBLE V. BUCK ET AL.
DENICKE ET AL.
ANGLO CALIFORNIA NATIONAL BANK ET AL.; DENICKE V. BRIGHAM ET AL.; AND DOBLE V. BUCK ET AL.
323 U.S. 816
Supreme Court of the United States (1944)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Mozingo v. York Cnty. Natural GAS Auth., 352 F.2d 78 (4th Cir. 1965)…and the Court had previously acted upon their concurrence in accepting the petition. Cf. 11 U.S.C. § 403(e); Mason v. El Dorado Irr. Dist., 144 F. 2d 189, 190 (9 Cir. 1944), cert. den. 323 U.S. 758, 65 S.Ct. 91, 89 L.Ed. 607, [*80] rehearing denied 323 U.S. 816, 65 S.Ct. 187, 89 L.Ed. 649. Special objection was lodged by the protestant to the provision in the plan allowing issuance of the prior lien bonds already described, because these bonds would have primacy over the new refunding bonds. Their authori…