EX PARTE PERCY ARTHUR WHISTLER; AND MARVICH

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By

• Wilkerson v. McCARTHY, 336 U.S. 53 (U.S. 1949)
  …eral Employers’ Liability Act in a case turning solely on jury issues. The only petition on behalf of a carrier that brought such a case here during this period was dismissed, and rightly, as improvidently granted. McCarthy v. Bruner, 322 U. S. 718; 323 U. S. 673. Nor does what the United States Reports disclose regarding the disposition of petitions for certiorari tell the whole story of the Court’s exercise of discretion in granting or denying them. This is so because of adherence, on the whole, to the wis…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• United States v. Moore, 166 F.2d 102 (7th Cir. 1948)
  …granting of remedies are based upon sound public policy, reasons for which need no further elaboration but apply to and are the basis for the requirements of diligence. See cases above cited. Bugg v. U. S., 8 Cir., 140 F. 2d 848, certiorari denied, 323 U. S. 673, 65 S.Ct. 89, 89 L.Ed. 547; Spaulding v. U. S., 6 Cir., 155 F. 2d 919; U. S. v. Spain, D.C., 32 F.Supp. 28; Nolan v. U. S., 8 Cir., 163 F. 2d 768. Hence, as provided in the Rules of Procedure, Rule 60, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, such motion…