UNITED STATES

v.

STANDARD RICE CO., INC.

Citator

Cited By

• Williams v. North Carolina, 325 U.S. 226 (U.S. 1945)
  …Carolina finds that no bona fide domicil was acquired in Nevada.” Williams v. North Carolina, supra, at 302. This is the precise issue which has emerged after retrial of the cause following our reversal. Its obvious importance brought the case here. 322 U. S. 725. The implications of the Full Faith and Credit Clause, Article IV, § 1 of the Constitution,2 first received the sharpanalysis [*228] of this Court in Thompson v. Whitman, 18 Wall. 457. Theretofore, uncritical notions about the scope of that Clause…
• Esenwein v. Commonwealth ex rel. Esenwein, 325 U.S. 279 (U.S. 1945)
  …d that petitioner did not have a bona fide domicil in Nevada when he obtained his decree of divorce. 153 Pa. Super. 69, 33 A. 2d 675. This was sustained by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 348 Pa. 455, 35 A. 2d 335, and we then granted certiorari. 322 U. S. 725. Since, according to Pennsylvania law, a support order does not survive divorce, Commonwealth v. Parker, 59 Pa. Super. 74; Commonwealth v. Kurniker, 96 Pa. Super. 553, the efficacy of the' Nevada divorce in Pennsylvania is the decisive question in…