MID-CONTINENT INVESTMENT CO.
v.
IGOE, JUDGE; AND MINNEAPOLIS-HONEYWELL REGULATOR CO. V. BARNES, JUDGE
MID-CONTINENT INVESTMENT CO.
IGOE, JUDGE; AND MINNEAPOLIS-HONEYWELL REGULATOR CO. V. BARNES, JUDGE
322 U.S. 716
Supreme Court of the United States (1944)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 366 U.S. 316 (U.S. 1961)…n important matter from going unreviewed, see H. R. Rep. No. 1317, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. (1944), and enacted a special statute, 58 Stat. 272, 15 U. S. C. § 29, pursuant to which this Court immediately certified the case to a Circuit Court of Appeals, 322 U. S. 716 (1944), which proceeded to decide the appeal. 148 F. 2d 416 (C. A. 2d Cir. 1945). See also United States v. United States District Court, 334 U. S. 258 (1948). Government counsel at the trial advised the District Court that he had no authority to s…
-
United States v. United States Dist. Court for the S. Dist. of N.Y., 334 U.S. 258 (U.S. 1948)…cuit judge of any such other circuit. “This Act shall apply to every case pending before the Supreme Court of the United States on the date of its enactment.” Thereupon we certified the cause to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. 322 U. S. 716. That court heard the case, sustained charges of monopoly against Alcoa, reversed the judgment of dismissal, and remanded the cause for further proceedings not inconsistent with its opinion. 148 F. 2d 416. It left open the question of the remedies t…