BEILFUSS
v.
CALIFORNIA

U.S. | 1944-02-07
No. 603
321 U.S. 746 Supreme Court of the United States (1944) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Appeal from the District Court of Appeal, 2d Appellate District, of California.

Per Curiam:

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. § 237 (a), Judicial Code, as amended, 28 U. S. C., § 344 (a). Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for writ of certiorari as required by § 237 (c) of the Judicial Code as amended, 28 U. S. C., § 344 (c), certiorari is denied.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Sherr v. Anaconda Wire & Cable Co., 149 F.2d 680 (2d Cir. 1945)
    …gined that the Legislature could by general words mean to take it away from the person in whom it was so legally vested, and who had been at a great deal of cost and charge in prosecuting.” Hence, although the reversal in Nathanson v. United States, 321 U.S. 746, 64 S.Ct. 522, 88 L.Ed. 1049, did not touch the point, the decision in United States v. Baker-Lockwood Manufacturing Co., 8 Cir., 138 F. 2d 48, may be open to conceivable doubt: i. e., that by filing a later action the United States could take the c…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw