UNITED STATES EX REL. BRENSILBER ET AL.

v.

BAUSCH & LOMB OPTICAL CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Morrison v. State, 247 So. 2d 97 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971)
  …PER CURIAM. Affirmed on authority of James v. State, 151 Fla. 534, 9 So. 2d 926 (1942), pet. den. 320 U.S. 710, 64 S.Ct. 86, 88 L.Ed. 417, and Coggins v. State, 101 So. 2d 400 (Fla.App.1958). CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.…
• Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Est. OF Bedford, 325 U.S. 283 (U.S. 1945)
  …, 318 U. S. [*286] 371; Emil v. Hartley, 318 U. S. 515; Fisher Co. v. Witmark & Sons, 318 U. S. 643; Equitable Society v. Comm’r, 321 U. S. 560; Medo Corp. v. Labor Board, 321 U. S. 678; United States ex rel. Brensilber v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co., 320 U. S. 711 (equally divided court). Respondent argues that the Rules of the court below, with respect to the opinions of the court, rehearings, issuance of mandate, and stay of mandate, show that the “opinion” is meant to constitute the court’s judgment. But…
• In re New York, 147 F.2d 40 (2d Cir. 1945)
  …on. See State of Texas v. United States, 292 U.S. 522, 531, 54 S.Ct. 819, 78 L.Ed. 1402; In re Missouri Pac. R. Co., D.C.E.D.Mo., 39 F.Supp. 436, 448, affirmed, Missouri Pac. R. Co. v. Thompson, 8 Cir., 134 F. 2d 139, certiorari denied 320 U.S. 806, 64 S.Ct. 187. The appellants argue that the plan is subject to the objection discussed in the Old Colony appeal, namely, that the Commission merely adopted the suggestions of the Joint Report. There is nothing wrong with such an adoption, if the Commission on t…