JONES

v.

BIDDLE, ATTORNEY GENERAL

Citator

Cited By

• Katz v. Horni Signal MFG. Corp., 145 F.2d 961 (2d Cir. 1944)
  …he Logic of Modern Physics (1927). Because of much misunderstanding, it is desirable to quote what we said on the subject in Cover v. Schwartz, 2 Cir., 133 F. 2d 541, 545, certiorari denied 319 U.S. 748, 63 S.Ct. 1158, 87 L.Ed. 1703, rehearing den. 319 U.S. 785, 63 S.Ct. 1325, 87 L.Ed. 1728: “The court, in deciding against a patentee-plaintiff, may, with propriety, hold (1) fihat his patent is invalid, or (2) that the defendant has not committed acts of infringement, or (3) that not only is the patent inva…
• United States ex rel. Reel v. Badt, 152 F.2d 627 (2d Cir. 1945)
  …be now, that the decision of 'the Director on the facts was final. See Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 321 U.S. 678, 681 note 1, 64 S.Ct. 830, 88 L.Ed. 1007; Bowles v. United States, 319 U.S. 33, 63 S.Ct. 912, 87 L.Ed. 1194, rehearing denied 319 U.S. 785, 63 S.Ct. 1323, 87 L.Ed. 1125; United States ex rel. Brandon v. Downer, 2 Cir., 139 F. 2d 761. It was correctly said by this court on the previous appeal at pages 848; 849 of United States ex rel. Reel v. Badt, 141 F. 2d 845,that: “The relator can…