FLETCHER

v.

EVENING STAR NEWSPAPER CO.; AND FLETCHER V. STEPHENS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

• Jones v. Cunningham, 371 U.S. 236 (U.S. 1963)
  …371 U. S. 187 (1962). Parker v. Ellis, 362 U. S. 574 (1960); Zimmerman v. Walker, 319 U. S. 744 (1943); Tornello v. Hudspeth, 318 U. S. 792 (1943). United States ex rel. Lynn v. Downer, 322 U. S. 756 (1944); United States ex rel. Innes v. Crystal, 319 U. S. 755 (1943); Weber v. Squier, 315 U. S. 810 (1942). Va. Code Ann. § 53-264. See Anderson v. Corall, 263 U. S. 193, 196 (1923) (“While [parole] is an amelioration of punishment, it is in legal effect imprisonment”) ; von Hen tig, Degrees of Parole Viola…
• Ex parte Mitsuye Endo, 323 U.S. 283 (U.S. 1944)
  …n Francisco, which is in the jurisdiction of the District Court), the corpus of appellant will be produced and the court’s order complied with in all respects. Thus it would seem that the case is not moot. In United States ex rel. Innes v. Crystal, 319 U. S. 755, the relator challenged a judgment of court martial by habeas corpus. The District Court denied his petition and the Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed that order. After that decision and before his petition for certiorari was filed here, he was remo…
• Parker v. Ellis, 362 U.S. 574 (U.S. 1960)
  …e language the Court used shortly thereafter to dispose of a case on grounds of mootness where the petitioner had been transferred from one custodian to another, but where he was still in the penitentiary. See United States ex rel. Innes v. Crystal, 319 U. S. 755. Whatever may be said of the Weber theory of mootness,22 it is irrelevant to the instant case, where it would be unnecessary to issue an order of discharge. The second case discussed by the Court is Tornello v. Hudspeth, supra, where a petition for…