THOMAS

v.

UNITED STATES; AND THOMAS V. ROSSETTER ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• In re Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp. Appeal of Pittsburgh Terminal Realization Corp., 183 F.2d 520 (3d Cir. 1950)
  …d depends upon “the provisions of the plan as confirmed and reservations, not inconsistent therewith, contained in the order of confirmation.” In re 4145 Broadway Hotel Co., 7 Cir., 131 F. 2d 120, 122, certiorari denied sub. nom. Thomas v. Rossiter, 318 U.S. 766, 63 S.Ct. 665, 87 L.Ed. 1137. See also In re George F. Nord Building Corporation, 7 Cir., 129 F. 2d 173, 176; Clinton Trust Co. v. John H. Elliott Leather Co., 2 Cir., 132 F. 2d 299; Shores v. Hendy Realization Co., 9 Cir., 133 F. 2d 738, 741; Mar-T…
• Matter of Muntz TV Inc. v. Allen, 229 F.2d 314 (7th Cir. 1956)
  …ons from attempting to enforce a lien upon its property. Under this section the court had the right to stay proceedings in any court against the debtor. In re 4145 Broadway Hotel Co., 7 Cir., 131 F. 2d 120, certiorari denied Thomas v. United States, 318 U.S. 766, 63 S.Ct. 664, 87 L.Ed. 1137. This is because, under the Constitution, a federal court’s jurisdiction in bankruptcy is paramount and exclusive, so that it may draw all controversies affecting the administration of the estate or the disposition of t…