PEDERSEN

v.

J. F. FITZGERALD CONSTRUCTION CO.

Citator

Cited By (23 total)

• McLEOD v. Threlkeld, 319 U.S. 491 (U.S. 1943)
  …avigable waterways are “engaged in commerce.” Overstreet v. North Shore Corp., 318 U. S. 125. So are employees of contractors when the employees are engaged in repairing bridges of interstate railroads. Pedersen v. J. F. Fitzgerald Construction Co., 318 U. S. 740, 742. In the present instance, it is urged that the conception of “in commerce” be extended beyond the employees engaged in actual work upon the transportation facilities.6 It is said that this Court decided an employee, engaged in similar work was…
• Alstate Constr. Co. v. Durkin, 345 U.S. 13 (U.S. 1953)
  …Of course production of “goods” for the purpose of shipping them across state lines is production “for commerce.” But we could not hold — consistently with Overstreet v. North Shore Corp., 318 U. S. 125, and Pedersen v. Fitzgerald Construction Co., 318 U. S. 740 — that the only way to produce goods “for commerce” is to produce them for transportation across state lines. In the Overstreet and Pedersen cases, supra, we had to decide whether employees engaged in repairing inter [*16] state roads and railroads…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• J. F. Fitzgerald Constr. Co. v. Pedersen, 324 U.S. 720 (U.S. 1945)
  …ee to be paid by the defendant, and costs of the action.” Pedersen v. Fitzgerald Construction Co., 173 Misc. 188, 18 N. Y. S. 2d 920. Id., 262 App. Div. 665, 30 N. Y. S. 2d 989. Id., 288 N. Y. 687, 43 N. E. 2d 83, affirming without opinion. Id., 318 U. S. 740. Opinion unreported. Pedersen v. Fitzgerald Construction Co., 266 App. Div. 1032, 44 N. Y. S. 2d 595. Id., 293 N. Y. 126, 56 N. E. 2d 77. 323 U. S. 698. See supra, p. 722. The New York trial court stated in its opinion (unreported): “The fair…