ROSKOS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Tesciona v. Hunter, 151 F.2d 589 (10th Cir. 1945)
  …tly the offenses charged in the first and eighth and ninth counts were not identical. Schultz v. Hudspeth, 10 Cir., 123 F. 2d 729, certiorari denied 317 U.S. 682, 63 S.Ct. 198, 87 L.Ed. 547; Kerr v. Johnston, 9 Cir., 130 F. 2d 637, certiorari denied 317 U.S. 696, 63 S.Ct. 437, 87 L.Ed. 557. It appears upon the face of the indictment that the two bags or pouches from which it was charged in the eighth and ninth counts respectively that separate mail matter was abstracted were among the six bags or pouches c…
• Riley v. United States, 212 F.2d 692 (4th Cir. 1954)
  …en claimant became totally and permanently disabled and not from March 16, 1928, when he was notified of this rating. The statutory provision seems clear upon this point”. See, also, Roskos v. United States, 3 Cir., 130 F. 2d 751, certiorari denied 317 U.S. 696, 63 S.Ct. 437, 87 L.Ed. 557; Sullivan v. United States, 6 Cir., 116 F. 2d 576; United States v. Tarrer, 5 Cir., 77 F. 2d 423, certiorari denied 296 U.S. 574, 56 S.Ct. 125, 80 L.Ed. 405; Boyd v. United States, D.C., 47 F.Supp. 339; Prifti v. United S…