MAX KREHER
v.
ANITA KREHER
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's dismissal of a divorce bill, finding the appellant failed to demonstrate an abuse of judicial discretion. The appeal was also subject to a motion to dismiss for non-compliance with court rules regarding briefs.
No, the appellant failed to clearly demonstrate an abuse of judicial discretion in the dismissal of the divorce bill.
“the only ques [*148] tion presented is whether the Chancellor abused judicial discretion in dismissing a bill for divorce on final hearing after testimony was taken and submitted.”
Identifies the central legal question before the court.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe appellant filed a bill for divorce, and after testimony was taken, the Chancellor dismissed the bill. The appellant appealed this dismissal. The a…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Appellate Brief Requirements cases and more on FLexlaw
This case is before us on motion to dismiss appeal after brief filed by appellant because of failure of such brief to meet requirements of Amended Rule 20, of this Court.
The brief falls far short of meeting the requirements of the Rule, but an examination of the record and consideration of such brief as has been filed discloses that the only ques*148tion presented is whether the Chancellor abused judicial discretion in dismissing a bill for divorce on final hearing after testimony was taken and submitted.
Appellant has failed to make it clearly to appear that there was an abuse of judicial discretion in the entry of the order complained of. So it should be affirmed.
So ordered.
Ellis, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Whitfield C. J., and Brown and Davis, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.