CALIFORNIA
v.
ANGLIM, U. S. COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE

U.S. | 1942-10-19
No. 371
317 U.S. 669 Supreme Court of the United States (1942) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Denberg v. United States R.R. Ret. Bd. & James L. Cowen, 696 F.2d 1193 (7th Cir. 1983)
    …ngress’ power to regulate interstate commerce was a significant source of its authority to enact the Railroad Retirement Act. Finnerty v. Cowen, 508 F. 2d 979, 983 (2d Cir.1974); California v. Anglim, 129 F. 2d 455, 459-460 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 317 U.S. 669, 63 S.Ct. 74, 87 L.Ed. 537 (1942). . Weinberger v. Salfi, 422 U.S. 749, 95 S.Ct. 2457, 45 L.Ed.2d 522 (1975), does not require an opposite conclusion. In Salfi, the Court ruled that, unless waived by the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare,…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw