ABRAHAM ET AL., TRUSTEES,

v.

HIDALGO COUNTY WATER CONTROL AND IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• State ex rel. Williams v. Neustadt, 149 F.2d 143 (10th Cir. 1945)
  …denied. Preston v. Kaw Pipe Line Co., supra; Creek Indians National Council v. Sinclair Prairie Oil Co., 10 Cir., 142 F. 2d 842, certiorari denied, 323 U.S. 781, 65 S.Ct. 269; Sewell v. J. E. Crosbie, Inc., 8 Cir., 127 F. 2d 599, certiorari denied, 317 U.S. 643, 63 S.Ct. 36, 87 L.Ed. 518. The lands involved are divided into two separate tracts. The county had acquired them at tax resale. Separate bids in writing were submitted for the purchase of the two tracts, and in each instance notice of sale was pub…
• Blake Constr. Co. & Ætna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. United States, 252 F.2d 658 (5th Cir. 1958)
  …n. [concrete] from top of block to underside of roof deck cone, [concrete] cap reinforced with 1 #40 T. & B.” . The Contractor cites among others: Highway Construction Company of Ohio v. City of Miami, Fla., 5 Cir., 126 F. 2d 777, certiorari denied 317 U.S. 643, 63 S.Ct. 35, 87 L.Ed. 518; Kilby Mfg. Co. v. Hinchman-Renton Fireproofing Co., 8 Cir., 132 F. 957. Subcontractor asserts that this was merely explanatory of doubtful terms and permissible under such authorities as Colonial Hotels, Inc. v. Maynard,…