EX PARTE ROBERT G. ERRINGTON; AND EX PARTE HENRY LONG

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Silliman, 167 F.2d 607 (3d Cir. 1948)
  …nd recover money already paid out if such payments were induced by fraudulent statements. Isenberg v. Biddle, 1941, 75 U.S.App.D.C. 100, 125 F. 2d 741; cf. United States v. Rodiek, 2 Cir., 1941, 117 F. 2d 588, aff’d by an equally divided court 1942, 315 U.S. 783, 62 S.Ct. 793, 86 L.Ed. 1190; Cummings v. Societe Suisse Pour Valeurs de Metaux, 1936, 66 App.D.C. 121, 85 F. 2d 287. Implicit in these cases is the holding that such fraud gives rise to a cause of action for, unless it did, there would be no founda…

  ← 1 / 5 →
• In re Halpern v. Bankruptcy, 426 F.2d 102 (2d Cir. 1970)
  …Norton v. Larney, 266 U.S. 511, 517, 45 S.Ct. 145, 69 L.Ed. 413 (1925); Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. East Bay Union of Machinists, Local 1304, 344 F. 2d 300, 306 (9 Cir. 1965); United States v. Rodiek, 117 F. 2d 588, 593 (2d Cir. 1941), aff’d, 315 U.S. 783, 62 S.Ct. 793, 86 L. Ed. 1190 (1942); Restatement of the Law of Judgments § 68, Comment o (1942); IB Moore, Federal Practice 0.443[5] at 3919 (1965). The reason for this rule is twofold. First, the decision on an issue not essential to the prior ju…
• Hamdi & Ibrahim Mango Co., Ltd. v. Reliance Ins. Co., 291 F.2d 437 (2d Cir. 1961)
  …ent reproduced as footnote 2 of our opinion, and we hold that the failure to raise the point before the district judge and before us amounted to a waiver of the claim for premiums. United States v. Rodiek, 2 Cir., 1941, 120 F. 2d 760, affirmed 1942, 315 U.S. 783, 62 S.Ct. 793, 86 L.Ed. 1190; Bassick Mfg. Co. v. Adams Grease Gun Corp., 2 Cir., 1931, 54 F. 2d 285; see Independent Wireless Telegraph Co. v. Radio Corp. of America, 1926, 270 U.S. 84, 46 S.Ct. 224, 70 L.Ed. 481. The insurer also maintains that c…