TERMINAL & SHAKER HEIGHTS REALTY CO.

v.

VAN SWERINGEN COMPANY; TERMINAL & SHAKER HEIGHTS REALTY CO. V. VAN SWERINGEN CORPORATION ET AL.; AND TERMINAL & SHAKER HEIGHTS REALTY CO. V. CLEVELAND TERMINAL BUILDING CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Merger Mines Corp. v. Grismer, 137 F.2d 335 (9th Cir. 1943)
  …al Co. v. Des Moines Union Ry. Co., 8 Cir., 52 F. 2d 616, 625, certiorari denied 285 U.S. 537, 52 S.Ct. 311, 76 L.Ed. 930; In re Van Sweringen Company, 6 Cir., 119 F. 2d 231, 235, certiorari denied Terminal & S. H. Realty Co. v. Van Sweringen Corp., 314 U.S. 671, 62 S.Ct. 136, 86 L.Ed. 537; Lebold v. Inland Steel Co., 7 Cir., 125 F. 2d 369, 372, certiorari denied 316 U.S. 675, 62 S.Ct. 1045, 86 L.Ed. 1749. Applying the foregoing standards to the instant case, we find that, however honestly conceived, the s…
• Stiers v. Martin, 264 F.2d 795 (4th Cir. 1959)
  …eir testimony. Findings of fact by the trial judge will not be disturbed unless clearly erroneous. Safeway Trails v. Allentown & Reading Transit Co., 4 Cir., 1950, 185 F. 2d 918; United States v. Still, 4 Cir., 1941, 120 F. 2d 876, certiorari denied 314 U.S. 671, 62 S.Ct. 135, 86 L.Ed. 537. Noting further appellant’s rejection of the Court’s offer to receive additional testimony as to appellee’s reasonable costs of contract completion, and perceiving no error in the proceedings in the District Court, the j…
• Smith v. Fihelly, 338 F.2d 964 (4th Cir. 1964)
  …nnot say that the finding of the district judge was clearly erroneous, Rule 52, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Johnson, Administratrix v. United States, 336 F. 2d 801 (4 Cir. 1964); United States v. Still, 120 F. 2d 876 (4 Cir. 1941), cert. den., 314 U.S. 671, 62 S.Ct. 135, 86 L.Ed. 537 (1941). Therefore, the judgment of the lower court is Affirmed.…