PRUDENCE REALIZATION CORP.
v.
GEIST, TRUSTEE

U.S. | 1942-01-05
No. 757
314 U.S. 606 Supreme Court of the United States (1942) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Brillhart v. Excess Ins. Co. of Am., 316 U.S. 491 (U.S. 1942)
    …ermination on the merits. 121 F. 2d 776. In view of the important question affecting the inter-relationship of the state and federal courts in the administration of the Federal Declaratory Judgments Act, 28 U. S. C. § 400, we brought the case here. 314 U. S. 606. Although the District Court had jurisdiction of the suit under the Federal Declaratory Judgments Act, it was under no compulsion to exercise that jurisdiction. The petitioner’s motion to dismiss the bill was addressed to the discretion of the cour…
  • Prudence Realization Corp. v. Geist, 316 U.S. 89 (U.S. 1942)
    …ificate holders. The Circuit Court of Appeals by a divided court held that it was bound to apply the rule announced in the New York cases cited, which it deemed to be a rule of construction of the guaranty of the certificates. We granted certiorari, 314 U. S. 606, because of the importance in bankruptcy administration of the questions raised. [*93] The court below recognized the implication of the requirement that a plan of reorganization under former § 77B (f) (1) of the Bankruptcy Act (see 11 U. S. C. § 62…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw