THOMAS ET AL.

v.

ROSSETTER ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Cleveland v. Second Nat. Bank & Tr. Co., 149 F.2d 466 (6th Cir. 1945)
  …judgment was here affirmed, Van Auken v. Second Nat’l Bank & Trust Co., 6 Cir., 117 F. 2d 938; Van Auken & Cleveland v. Second Nat’l Bank & Trust Co., 6 Cir., 117 F. 2d 1009. A petition in each case for certiorari was, by' the Supreme Court, denied. 313 U.S. 593, 61 S.Ct. 1118, 85 L.Ed. 1547; 313 U.S. 594, 61 S.Ct. 1119, 85 L.Ed. 1547. Further proceedings in the District Court awaited the outcome of the new litigation begun by the appellant in the courts of Michigan. This consisted of a petition by the app…
• Mitsubishi Shoji Kaisha v. Societe Purfina Maritime. the Laurent Meeus, 133 F.2d 552 (9th Cir. 1942)
  …90, 60 Lloyd’s List L. R. 147; The Arantzazu Mendi, [1939] A. C. 256, 263, where in each case the government took actual possession. As in The Katingo Hadjipatera, D.C.S.D.N.Y.1940, 40 F.Supp. 546, affirmed 2 Cir., 119 F. 2d 1022, certiorari denied 313 U.S. 593, 61 S.Ct. 1118, 85 L.Ed. 1547; Ex parte Muir, 1921, 254 U.S. 522, 529, 41 S.Ct. 185, 65 L.Ed. 383; The Attualita, 4 Cir., 238 F. 909, 911. In none of these cases was it proved that the notifying government had taken possession for its exclusive bene…