ORWITZ
v.
BOARD OF DENTAL EXAMINERS
ORWITZ
BOARD OF DENTAL EXAMINERS
313 U.S. 546
Supreme Court of the United States (1941)
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Semler v. State Board of Dental Examiners, 294 U. S. 608; Brown v. Massachusetts, 308 U. S. 504. (2) Cleveland & Pittsburgh R. Co. v. Cleveland, 235 U. S. 50, 53; Hiawassee Power Co. v. Carolina-Tenn. Co., 252 U. S. 341, 344; White River Co. v. Arkansas, 279 U. S. 692, 700.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Semler v. Or. State Bd. of Dental Exam'rs, 294 U.S. 608 (U.S. 1935)
- Hiawassee River Power Co. v. Carolina-Tennessee Power Co., 252 U.S. 341 (U.S. 1920)
- Cleveland & Pittsburgh R.R. Co. v. City of Cleveland, 235 U.S. 50 (U.S. 1914)
- White River Lumber Co. v. Arkansas Ex rel. Applegate, 279 U.S. 692 (U.S. 1929)
- Hwy. Steel & Mfg. Co. v. Crawford Cnty. Cir. Court, 308 U.S. 504 (U.S. 1939)