SAFE HARBOR WATER POWER CORP.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.

U.S. | 1941-05-12
Nos. 907 and 908
313 U.S. 546 Supreme Court of the United States (1941) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,:

Per Curiam,:

The motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Stratton v. St. Louis S. W. Ry. Co., 282 U. S. 10, 15-16; Virginian Ry. Co. v. United States, 272 U. S. 658, 671-672; Ex parte Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 279 U. S. 822. See Federal Power Act, § 313 (b) (Act of August 26,1935, c. 687, Title II, § 213,49 Stat. 847,860,16 U. S. C., § 825L (b)).

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Safe Harbor Water Power Corp. v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 124 F.2d 800 (3d Cir. 1941)
    …complaint did not state a cause of action requiring a three-judge court was correct, then the Supreme Court was without any appellate jurisdiction whatsoever. The Supreme Court dismissed both appeals, Safe Harbor Water Power Corp. v. United States, 313 U.S. 546, 61 S.Ct. 1084, 1085, 85 L.Ed. 1512, .and cited cases holding mandamus and not appeal to be the remedy when a three-judge should have been convened. It then referred to Section 313(b). If we are correct in our interpretation of this decision, we t…
  • The Chemehuevi Tribe OF Indians v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 489 F.2d 1207 (D.C. Cir. 1973)
    …; cf. FPC v. Union Electric Co., 381 U.S. 90, 110-112 n. 30, 85 S.Ct. 1253, 14 L.Ed.2d 239 (1965); id. at 112 n. 1, 85 S.Ct. 1253 (Goldberg, J., dissenting). But see Safe Harbor Water Power Co. v. FPC, 124 F. 2d 800, 808 (3d Cir.), appeal dismissed, 313 U.S. 546, 61 S.Ct. 1084, 85 L.Ed. 1512 (1941). . The Court did consider several earlier cases involving various aspects of the Act. See United States v. Appalachian Power Co., 311 U.S. 377, 61 S.Ct. 291, 85 L.Ed. 243 (1940); Broad River Power Co. v. Query,…
    1 / 2

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw