COMMERCIAL MOLASSES CORP.
v.
NEW YORK TANK BARGE CORP.
COMMERCIAL MOLASSES CORP.
NEW YORK TANK BARGE CORP.
313 U.S. 541
Supreme Court of the United States (1941)
Caution
Also reported at: 85 L. Ed. 1510 · 61 S. Ct. 840 · SCDB 1940-177 · 1941 U.S. LEXIS 734
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam [*542]:
Mr. T. Catesby Jones, with whom Messrs. D. Roger Englar, Leonard J. Matteson, and Ezra G. Benedict Fox were on the brief, for petitioner. Mr: Robert S. Erskine, with whom Messrs. Cletus Keating, L. de Grove Potter, and Richard Sullivan were on the brief, for respondent.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Alliance Assurance Co., Ltd. v. United States, 252 F.2d 529 (2d Cir. 1958)…should exist where the bailment, as here, was compulsory. Commercial Molasses Corp. v. New York Tank Barge Corp., 314 U.S. 104, 62 S.Ct. 156, 86 L.Ed. 89, reaffirming by a 5-4 majority a previous decision of an evenly divided court in 313 U.S. 541, 61 S.Ct. 840, 85 L.Ed. 1510, aside from the fact that it did not construe New York law, is distinguishable. There the court was concerned with a voluntary bailment inuring in part to the benefit of the bailor. Here the bailor had no choice of the place of bailme…
-
Harris v. Zion's Sav. Bank & Tr. Co., 127 F.2d 1012 (10th Cir. 1942)…orari to the Supreme Court of the United States. The writ was issued and the matter was set down for argument. After argument, the court dismissed the application for the writ. Harris, Administrator, v. Zion’s Savings Bank & Trust Co., 313 U.S. 541, 61 S.Ct. 840, 85 L.Ed. 1509. Thereupon the Zion’s Savings Bank and Trust Company filed an amended motion to strike the petition to revive and the amended petition to proceed under subsection (s). The motion was sustained and judgment was entered accordingly. Th…